Hot to Not

In this episode of Talking Real Money, Don and Tom dig into the Washington State pension system’s heavy exposure to private equity, sparked by Jason Zweig’s Wall Street Journal reporting and a Seattle Times investigation. They explain why high fees, opaque valuations, and lack of liquidity make private equity especially dangerous for public retirement funds—and why Washington leads the nation in risk. The conversation expands to compare pension strategies across states, question governance and oversight, and warn retirees about the real-world consequences of excessive risk. Later, the hosts respond to a listener trapped in a high-fee, actively managed portfolio and variable annuity, illustrating how costs and complexity quietly erode wealth. The show wraps with practical retirement guidance inspired by Warren Buffett—simplify and protect—plus a discussion of converting mutual funds to ETFs for greater efficiency.

0:04 Show open, call-in invitation, and setup on private equity

0:32 Jason Zweig’s WSJ reporting on private equity fees and markups

1:25 Washington State pension’s heavy private equity exposure

3:23 Valuation and liquidity problems in private equity

4:35 Breakdown of WA pension assets (private equity + real estate)

5:18 Risks of market downturns and illiquidity

6:25 Who’s overseeing the pension fund and their qualifications

7:06 Concerns for Washington retirees and contributors

8:28 Board “experts” and potential conflicts of interest

9:55 Difficulty exiting private equity investments

11:06 Questioning reported 12.3% returns vs public markets

11:59 Call for political accountability and reform

12:50 Comparison to states using mostly public index funds

13:35 Why private equity suffers most in downturns

14:22 Comparison of pension private equity exposure by state

15:58 Rebalancing and “emperor’s clothes” concern

17:07 Caller Luke reacts to pension risks

18:11 Promotion of RetireMeet and retirement education

19:22 Warren Buffett’s retirement advice: simplify and protect

20:28 Risk reduction and advisor role in retirement

21:26 Fiduciary standards and conflicts of interest

22:55 Emphasis on simple, protective portfolios

23:07 Caller Jane asks about high advisory fees

24:40 Discussion of “active management” risks

26:12 Review of proposed funds and red flags

29:57 Analysis of high-fee, high-turnover portfolio

30:57 Concentration and volatility concerns

32:16 Variable annuity warning signs

33:37 Commission conflicts and surrender charges

33:57 Recommendation to change advisors

34:56 Recap of excessive fees and risks

36:33 Importance of honest warnings vs future losses

37:48 Question on converting Vanguard mutual funds to ETFs

38:52 Advantages of ETFs: cost, tax efficiency, liquidity

Next
Next

High Yield Risk